An executive order from outgoing President Joe Biden intended to enhance America’s leadership in AI infrastructure has faced criticism, suggesting it may be somewhat rushed and inconsistent, particularly in light of recently announced restrictions on AI chip exports. Avivah Litan, a distinguished VP analyst at Gartner, raised questions regarding the urgency behind these orders, especially with a new administration about to take over. She expressed concern over the lack of consultation with industry stakeholders before these directives were created.
While Biden’s order, released on January 14, aims to support private sector development of AI infrastructure using clean energy, the prior order on AI chip exports restricts necessary exports to allied nations, raising eyebrows about the overall strategy. According to Biden, the initiatives are meant to bolster U.S. competitiveness, national security, and promote responsible AI development.
Internationally, the UK government also unveiled an AI Opportunities Action Plan, emphasizing a collaborative approach with industry and academia to tackle workforce and data challenges associated with AI. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer highlighted that AI will transform various societal aspects, indicating a proactive stance towards this technological shift.
In comparing the U.S. and UK plans, Litan noted that the UK’s strategy appears more comprehensive, addressing workforce development and ethical considerations in AI deployment. Conversely, the U.S. plan seems heavily focused on national security and clean energy without directly confronting the education and skills gaps concerning AI technologies.
Concerns also loom regarding the upcoming Trump administration, which analysts predict will likely dismantle initiatives focused on clean energy. This political uncertainty adds to the complexity surrounding the future of Biden’s AI infrastructure initiatives, raising doubts about their sustainability and implementation under new leadership.
As the landscape of AI governance and infrastructure continues to evolve, both countries are shaping their respective approaches influenced by domestic capabilities, international challenges, and the overarching need for sustainable and responsible technological advancement.
